Cooke, Hinchliffe address critical pedagogy in new handbook

Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe
Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe, Affiliate Professor

A new resource for educators—Critical Library Pedagogy Handbook, a two-volume set published in September by the Association of College & Research Libraries—examines the theory and practice of critical pedagogy in the LIS classroom. According to editors Nicole Pagowsky and Kelly McElroy, critical pedagogy “incorporates inclusive and reflective teaching for aims of social justice; it provides mechanisms for students to evaluate their social, political, and economic standing, and to question societal norms and how these norms perpetuate societal injustices.”

iSchool Assistant Professor Nicole A. Cooke wrote the chapter, “Documenting Your Critical Journey,” which is included in Volume 1.

Summary: This chapter challenges librarians to reflect on their practice as information professionals, especially in regards to the concept of feminist pedagogy, and think about the ways in which they might parlay their reflections into a critical professional practice. Self-reflection is an important element of developing and maintaining a critical LIS practice. The exercise presented in this chapter is useful for LIS professionals at all stations, from graduate students, to practitioners, to faculty. And because the profession and our communities will never cease changing, information professionals should be reflecting and refining their practices on a regular basis.

"I am particularly proud of this chapter because it emerged directly from my work with iSchool students in the Race, Gender, and Sexuality in the Information Professions course (LIS 537). The students really embraced the pedagogy that I describe in this chapter and produced beautiful final projects and reflections,” said Cooke.

A chapter authored by affiliated faculty member Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe (MS '94) is titled, “Loading Examples to Further Human Rights Education” and also included in Volume 1.

Summary: Academic librarians often struggle against the limited amount of time we have with students relative to the learning goals we have for information literacy, and the idea of also including a critical framework is daunting. This chapter presents a strategy for “loading examples” through thoughtful selection of terms and resources that enables librarians to pursue human rights education, which is well-aligned with campus learning goals for multicultural awareness, global perspectives, diversity, etc. in even the shortest of instructional encounters. An open access copy of the chapter is available in IDEALS.

Cooke was named a "Mover & Shaker" by Library Journal in 2007 and was the 2016 recipient of the American Library Association's Equality Award. Her research and teaching interests include human information behavior (particularly in the online context), critical cultural information studies, and diversity and social justice in librarianship with an emphasis on infusing them into LIS education and pedagogy. She holds an MEd in adult education from Penn State, and a Master of Library Science and a PhD in communication, information, and library studies from Rutgers University, where she was an ALA Spectrum Doctoral Fellow.

Hinchliffe is a professor and coordinator for Information Literacy Services and Instruction with the University Library. Her research interests include teaching and learning, higher education, globalization, information literacy, library assessment/evaluation, and library quality. She holds master’s degrees in library and information science and education, both from Illinois.

Tags:
Updated on
Backto the news archive

Related News

Trainor receives the Karen Wold Level the Learning Field Award

Senior Lecturer Kevin Trainor has been selected by the Division of Disability Resources and Educational Services (DRES) to receive the 2024 Karen Wold Level the Learning Field Award. This award honors exemplary members of faculty and staff for advocating and/or implementing instructional strategies, technologies, and disability-related accommodations that afford students with disabilities equal access to academic resources and curricula. 

Kevin Trainor

Seo coauthors chapter on data science and accessibility

Assistant Professor JooYoung Seo and Mine Dogucu, professor of statistics in the Donald Bren School of Information and Computer Sciences at the University of California Irvine, have coauthored a chapter in the new book Teaching Accessible Computing. The goal of the book, which is edited by Alannah Oleson, Amy J. Ko and Richard Ladner, is to help educators feel confident in introducing topics related to disability and accessible computing and integrating accessibility into their courses.

JooYoung Seo

iSchool instructors ranked as excellent

Fifty-five iSchool instructors were named in the University's List of Teachers Ranked as Excellent for Fall 2023. The rankings are released every semester, and results are based on the Instructor and Course Evaluation System (ICES) questionnaire forms maintained by Measurement and Evaluation in the Center for Innovation in Teaching and Learning. 

iSchool Building

ConnectED: Tech for All podcast launched by Community Data Clinic

The Community Data Clinic (CDC), a mixed methods data studies and interdisciplinary community research lab led by Associate Professor Anita Say Chan, has released the first episode of its new podcast, ConnectED: Tech for All. Community partners on the podcast include the Housing Authority of Champaign County, Champaign-Urbana Public Health District, Project Success of Vermilion County, and Cunningham Township Supervisor’s Office.

Community Data Clinic podcast logo

New study shows LLMs respond differently based on user’s motivation

A new study conducted by PhD student Michelle Bak and Assistant Professor Jessie Chin, which was recently published in the Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (JAMIA), reveals how large language models (LLMs) respond to different motivational states. In their evaluation of three LLM-based generative conversational agents (GAs)—ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Llama 2—the researchers found that while GAs are able to identify users' motivation states and provide relevant information when individuals have established goals, they are less likely to provide guidance when the users are hesitant or ambivalent about changing their behavior.